Message From the President
Must Environmental Leaders Conform? Or Dare We Actually Lead?
May 16, 2022
Joseph Scalia III, Psya.D.
I deeply lament that I was President of Montana Wilderness Association, recently re-named Wild Montana, when it was transitioning to the much ballyhooed and highly grant-remunerated "compromise and collaboration" model of navigating conservation disputes. That is, I mourn that I helped shepherd this acquiescent approach into its current popularity. Being drawn to its promotional dual notions of healing antagonism with traditional rivals, and "breaking the Wilderness logjam," my Board members and I did not grasp the lures presented, or the fateful gaps in the plan.
The rationale was that it had been so long since Montana experienced Wilderness legislation prominence, that we could erupt the impasse, and foster good societal will in the process. And then, there was the lure of vast monies rewarded. Heck, we could fund attractive offices, offer much-deserved, professional-level salaries and benefits to our staff, and help move the Montana environmental community into greater respectability. All by taking the grants, and the flattery, prolifically offered by corporate donors and sometimes their governmental partners.
We did not deliberate upon the ethics of remuneration, or the science of ecosystems. We were hooked.
Looking back 15 years later, and many miles of critical inquiry and personal maturing, I see Montana's remaining wilderness-quality lands being perilously offered up to the powers that be under the same guises of being practical, and working with the status quo, as we thought of it back then.
The Hyalite Porcupine Buffalo Horn Wilderness Study Area, and the roadless areas surrounding it on both sides of the Gallatin River - think the iconic Lionhead Recommended Wilderness (so designated in the former Forest Plan) - constitute the still legislatively unprotected, most aesthetically stunning, and biologically crucial portion of the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. Not to mention its specific, crucial importance to the Yellowstone grizzly's longevity, a longevity that is genetically dependent on access to grizzly bears further north in the Northern Rockies Ecosystem.
Yet the new Forest Plan, and mostly recommended by the former Montana Wilderness Association (Wild Montana), would cede to various glossily named non-Wilderness designations - with all their current and future exploitative dangers - the most important parts of these lands. While it at least recommends Wilderness protection for more than half of the WSA - including the humbling Big Creek area on the Gallatins' east side - the most lower-elevation, meadow- dense, and wildlife-significant portions of it are sacrificed, such as the contiguous Buffalo Horn and Porcupine Creek drainages perilously adjacent to Big Sky's recreational mass. And not to forget the West Pine on the Paradise Valley side, crucial as it is to a major elk herd.
Still, the iconic Gallatin Crest would potentially be designated Wilderness. Yet again, a caveat. Such landscape selection is a move in the direction of what Wilderness advocates disparagingly call rock-and-ice wilderness. It's a way to claim great success while hiding what has been sacrificed to do so.
Thus, the plan's advocates are using their amply grant-empowered staff and other monetary resources to widely deliver their proposal to the public as a "victory" for wilderness, wildlife, and the Montana people. I expect that they still believe, in the way I once did, that they are doing the right thing. While its members would personally want more ecosystem-sound land designations, they think that they are gaining all that is practical in today's Montana.
Notwithstanding the fact that most Montanans might well object if they understood the stakes, rather than the advertising version they are presented, there is another crucial point to be made.
What if environmental leaders did not acquiesce to putatively dominant unfriendliness to Wilderness designation? What if they didn't conform to the story that's publicly delivered? What if, instead, they got out in front, and argued forcefully - with all the big-money resources they have to potentiate such efforts - what if they argued passionately, persuasively for broad Wilderness protections that are based upon ecosystem considerations, without succumbing to what Aldo Leopold called political and economic expediency? Expediency. A good word: "The quality of being convenient and practical despite possibly being improper or immoral; convenience."
What if environmental - and political - leaders placed deeply and broadly into the public discourse the multiple rewards of biologically defensible conservation? What if they promoted the psychological and spiritual gains of self-restraint in such protections, and the giving up of popular adrenaline- and identity charged, quietude-avoidant recreational uplifts? What if they fought instead for the mature and generative experiences of Real Conservation? Of real wilderness?
But, they claim, recreationists, especially mountain bikers - which, in fact, is not some mountain biker collective consciousness but instead is industry-monetized mountain biking organizations - that recreationists are such a political force that we cannot expect to win ecosystem-based boundaries of new Wilderness Areas. However, can't the public be mobilized to support these greater ecosystemic and psychological values?
What about environmental leaders - and the local and Statewide political leaders who have all too uncritically endorsed the ethically unstudied compromises - what if they did not conform to what they have claimed are dominant forces' demands? What if, instead, they were to actually lead?
Joseph Scalia III, Psya.D. is a psychoanalyst in private practice in Livingston, Montana. He is President of Gallatin Yellowstone Wilderness Alliance and a former President of Montana Wilderness Association (now re-named only Wild Montana).
-Wildgrounds to Playgrounds-
GYWA Webinar Event
Recorded April 8, 2022
Recent Articles & Publications
May 20th - Kabel Roedel, Analysis of recent federal land protections shows Western states are all over the map, KUNR
May 19th - Carole King, ‘America’s forests are a key climate solution’, The Hill
May 18th - George Wuerthner, Gratitude for National Parks, Counterpunch
May 16th - Todd Wilkinson, Grizzlies Around Yellowstone Are Entering A Big Squeeze, Mountain Journal
May 12th - George Wuerthner, Conservation Groups Threaten To Sue On East Paradise Grazing Decision, The Wildlife News
April 27th - George Ochenski, Why is Environmental Protection a Partisan Issue?, Counterpunch
April 23rd - George Wuerthner, Montana’s Bitterroot Front Project More FS Snake Oil, The Wildlife News
April 22nd - Mike Garrity, Protect Old Growth and Mature Forests, Counterpunch
April 14th - Bill Schneider, Viewpoint: Wilderness ‘purists’ the last hope for Montana’s wild places, Missoula Current
April 10th - Nancy Schultz, Daines, Risch off base in column about wolves, Bozeman Daily Chronicle
April 10th - George Wuerthner, George Wuerthner: Yellowstone the shining beacon for conservation, Billings Gazette
April 9th - Bill Schneider, Are conservation purists really the problem?, Daily Montanan
April 6th - Clint Nagel, Wilderness 'purists' aren't in it for personal gain, Bozeman Daily Chronicle
April 5th - Todd Wilkinson, Outdoor Recreation Equals Conservation: Debunking The Myth, Mountain Journal
April Issue - George Wuerthner, Yellowstone National Park At 150: Still A Remarkable Achievement, National Parks Traveler
April 1st - Mike Garrity, What are the Greater Yellowstone Coalition’s Ethics Worth?, Counter Punch
March 29th - Todd Wilkinson, Is Yellowstone Tourism Promotion Helping Or Hurting The Protection Of Wild Places and Wildlife?, Mountain Journal
March 28th - Paige Williams, Killing Wolves to Own the Libs?, The New Yorker
March 24th - Christopher Ketcham, Is clear-cutting U.S. forests good for wildlife?, National Geographic
March 13 - MoJo, How Much Is Enough? (To Save Or Destroy A World-Class Ecosystem?), Mountain Journal
Spring 2022 - Vaia Errett, Keep It Wild, Outside Bozeman
The Gallatin Yellowstone Wilderness Act
Click on double arrow in upper left to view map legend
The Gallatin Yellowstone Wilderness Act would safeguard the Northern Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem as part of the National Wilderness Preservation System, the gold standard of land designations on our public lands.
Want to learn about Wilderness? Visit Wilderness Connect
Listen to Todd Wilkinson's lecture at the 45th anniversary of the Gallatin Wildlife Association.
A short film by GYWA
The Gallatin Yellowstone Wilderness Alliance (GYWA) is a non-profit grassroots wilderness organization based in Bozeman, Montana. We formed in early 2019, at a time when our very planet and humanity itself are terribly imperiled, and too many conservation groups keep carving up the landscape, and calling it a victory. We aim to rally public support around the proposal to protect the remaining 1 million plus acres of roadless lands on the Custer Gallatin National Forest north of Yellowstone National Park as Wilderness. These vital wildlands contain world-class wildlife habitat and critical landscape linking the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem to other large ecosystems to the north, creating connectivity crucial to the preservation of both the region's and the Earth's threatened biodiversity. Because these dangers have been kept from public awareness, we aim to respectfully open up a needed, hard conversation.
Grizzly Bears and Mountain Bikes Don't Play Nice...
Consider an ongoing donation of $10 per month.
Make a donation at a dollar amount that is comfortable for you.
If you prefer to pick up a pen...
Please send your check to:
Gallatin Yellowstone Wilderness Alliance
P.O. Box 5256
Bozeman, Montana 59717